<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Docile pitch, yet a memorable match</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chennai.metblogs.com/2008/03/29/docile-pitch-yet-a-memorable-match/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chennai.metblogs.com/2008/03/29/docile-pitch-yet-a-memorable-match/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:24:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nilu</title>
		<link>http://chennai.metblogs.com/2008/03/29/docile-pitch-yet-a-memorable-match/comment-page-1/#comment-8420</link>
		<dc:creator>nilu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chennai.metblogs.com/2008/03/29/docile-pitch-yet-a-memorable-match/#comment-8420</guid>
		<description>&quot;Think back to the tied test against Australia in 1986 or the agonising loss to Pakistan in 1999&quot;

Throughout the mid to late 80s, Chepauk was a featherbed. It was fast and furious in the 70s and early 80s. That tied test had a really flat track and the match was made interesting only by a brave declaration by the Ausssies after dominating the Test for 4 days. Again in the 80s, Gooch and Gatting swept Sivaramakrishnan away to 650 odd. So, Chepauk was at its worst then -- it was at its best in the 70s when it was said to be the fastest in the world.

In the 90s, the fast track that became a featherbed was converted into a spinners&#039; wicket -- actually, a good spinners&#039; wicket. One where quality spinners could hurry the batsmen with fast turn and biting bounce. And, one where good shots had value.

Now, it looks like a throwback to the 80s. I suspect, the bad weather leading up to the game had an impact on the preparation of the wicket. We&#039;ll have to cut some slack to the wonderful ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Think back to the tied test against Australia in 1986 or the agonising loss to Pakistan in 1999&quot;</p>
<p>Throughout the mid to late 80s, Chepauk was a featherbed. It was fast and furious in the 70s and early 80s. That tied test had a really flat track and the match was made interesting only by a brave declaration by the Ausssies after dominating the Test for 4 days. Again in the 80s, Gooch and Gatting swept Sivaramakrishnan away to 650 odd. So, Chepauk was at its worst then &#8212; it was at its best in the 70s when it was said to be the fastest in the world.</p>
<p>In the 90s, the fast track that became a featherbed was converted into a spinners&#8217; wicket &#8212; actually, a good spinners&#8217; wicket. One where quality spinners could hurry the batsmen with fast turn and biting bounce. And, one where good shots had value.</p>
<p>Now, it looks like a throwback to the 80s. I suspect, the bad weather leading up to the game had an impact on the preparation of the wicket. We&#8217;ll have to cut some slack to the wonderful ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
